There’s a point in this article where I thought he was going to go in one direction, and then he went in the completely opposite direction. He notes on his blog “My regular readers have the capacity to deal with this sort of topic but it gained a bit too much attention from outside my normal reading circle.”
Well, I’ve never been a regular reader, and now I certainly never will be. Hey Scott, is that because your regular readers are all a bunch of privileged male douchebags like yourself? Also worth asking: where did the attention from “outside” your “normal circle” originally come from?
Scott Adams wrote this post today, March 7 2011, on his blog and then deleted it.
The topic my readers most want me to address is something called men’s rights. (See previous post.) This is a surprisingly good topic. It’s dangerous. It’s relevant. It isn’t…
